No-Code vs Traditional Machine Learning for Lead Generation: A Comparative Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56472/ICCSAIML25-114Keywords:
AWS Sage Maker Canvas, Direct Selling, Lead Generation, Machine Learning, No-Code ML, Traditional MLAbstract
This research paper compares no-code machine learning (ML) platforms, specifically AWS SageMaker Canvas, with traditional Python-based ML methods in the context of lead generation for a direct selling company. The study examines each approach's performance, cost-effectiveness, ease of use, effort and compatibility for various business scenarios using a real case study of a direct selling company with 40000 consultants and 10 million customers. It reveals that while traditional ML delivers improved performance (22% higher conversion improvement), it also demands specialized skills, significant development time and pipeline management. On the other hand, no-code solution offers faster implementation (12 vs. 18 weeks) and higher ROI (2566.67% vs 388.14%), while also enabling business users with minimal technical background to build and deploy predictive models efficiently. This research also helps companies to make informed decisions about their ML strategy and implementation for lead generation. Based on the findings, the study recommends using No-code ML platforms when speed, ease of use, and lower costs are prioritized; opting for traditional ML methods when business needs demand high customization, advanced analytics, and detailed model transparency and considering a hybrid approach to leverage the strengths of both solutions by prototyping quickly with no-code tools and deploying robust, scalable solutions using traditional ML techniques.[1][2]
Downloads
References
[1] Internal company case study data and implementation experiences.
[2] Amazon Web Services. (2024). No-code Machine Learning - Amazon SageMaker Canvas. Retrieved from https://aws.amazon.com/sagemaker-ai/canvas/
[3] Gupta, S. (2024, February 19). A Deep Dive into Lead Scoring Techniques Using Machine Learning. Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@creatorvision03/a-deep-dive-into-lead-scoring-techniques-using-machine-learning-3ec85864645a
[4] Integrated MLM Software. (2025, March 28). AI in MLM: How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming Direct Sales. Retrieved from https://integratedmlmsoftware.com/artificial-intelligence-direct-selling-mlm/
[5] Tpoint Tech. (2024). Lead Generation using Machine Learning. Retrieved from https://www.tpointtech.com/lead-generation-using-machine-learning
[6] Szabo-Toke, A. (2023, August 30). How I built an AI lead scoring model with Python. LinkedIn. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-i-built-ai-lead-scoring-model-python-adam-szabo-toke
[7] Dasha.AI. (2023, October 24). Generative AI vs. Traditional Methods in Lead Generation. Retrieved from https://dasha.ai/en-us/blog/generative-ai-vs-traditional-methods-in-lead-generation
[8] Cognism. (2025, March 18). AI for B2B Lead Generation: The Ultimate Guide. Retrieved from https://www.cognism.com/blog/ai-lead-generation.
[9] Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python – https://scikit-learn.org/stable/
[10] McKinsey & Company. (2024). The State of AI in 2024: Generative AI's Breakout Year. McKinsey Digital.
[11] Salesforce. (2024). State of the Connected Customer Report.
[12] R. Daruvuri, “An improved AI framework for automating data analysis,” World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 863–866, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2022.13.1.0749.
[13] Brownlee, J. (2024). Your First Machine Learning Project in Python Step-By-Step. Machine Learning Mastery. Retrieved from https://www.machinelearningmastery.com/machine-learning-in-python-step-by-step/
