Interoperability and Vendor Neutrality in O-RAN Deployments

Authors

  • Varinder Sharma Technical Manager. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56472/WCAI25-135

Keywords:

O-RAN, interoperability, vendor neutrality, open RAN architecture, open fronthaul, 5G, 6G, RAN Intelligent Controller (RIC), Service Management and Orchestration (SMO), multi-vendor integration, open interfaces, network disaggregation, 3GPP

Abstract

The rapid evolution of 5G networks and the anticipated transition toward 6G architectures have amplified the demand for open, flexible, and vendor-neutral solutions in radio access networks (RAN). The Open Radio Access Network (O-RAN) initiative, driven by the O-RAN Alliance, promises to address this requirement by defining open interfaces, standardized architectures, and disaggregated components that allow multi-vendor interoperability. However, achieving seamless interoperability across diverse hardware and software vendors while maintaining operational efficiency, security, and performance remains a non-trivial challenge. This paper presents an in-depth investigation into the principles, challenges, and implementation strategies for ensuring interoperability and vendor neutrality in O-RAN deployments. The study combines a comprehensive literature analysis, covering standards from the O-RAN Alliance, 3GPP specifications, and industry whitepapers, with an experimental methodology based on a multi-vendor O-RAN testbed. The methodology leverages open fronthaul interfaces, Service Management and Orchestration (SMO) frameworks, and RAN Intelligent Controller (RIC) platforms to evaluate interoperability under realistic network loads and varied radio conditions.

The results reveal that, while the O-RAN specifications provide a robust framework for interoperability, vendor-specific deviations in control plane protocols, timing synchronization, and hardware abstraction layers often create integration bottlenecks. Vendor neutrality, while theoretically achievable through strict adherence to open standards, is hindered by proprietary performance optimization techniques and security extensions that are not fully standardized. Our findings indicate that an interoperability compliance score exceeding 92% can be achieved by employing rigorous conformance testing, standardized API validation, and an iterative integration process supported by AI-driven network monitoring. Furthermore, the study highlights the economic and strategic benefits of vendor-neutral O-RAN deployments, including reduced total cost of ownership (TCO), increased innovation cycles, and greater resilience against vendor lock-in. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by proposing a structured interoperability validation framework that combines technical conformance, performance benchmarking, and cross-vendor orchestration testing. The proposed approach not only addresses the current limitations in multi-vendor O-RAN integration but also provides a scalable roadmap for ensuring sustained interoperability as networks evolve toward 6G and beyond. By balancing open standards with adaptive vendor collaboration, the framework supports the realization of a truly open, high-performance, and cost-effective RAN ecosystem

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] O-RAN Alliance, “O-RAN Architecture Description v10.0,” O-RAN.WG1.O-RAN-Architecture-Description-v10.0, Jul. 2024.

[2] P. Rost, C. Mannweiler, D. S. Michalopoulos, and M. Breitbach, “3GPP 5G Functional Split Architecture and O-RAN Integration Challenges,” IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 42–50, Jun. 2024.

[3] O-RAN Alliance, “O-RAN Global PlugFest Spring 2024 Summary Report,” O-RAN Alliance Technical Report, Jun. 2024.

[4] A. Ghosh, R. Ratasuk, B. Mondal, and N. Mangalvedhe, “Open RAN and Vendor Neutrality: Enabling a Competitive 5G Ecosystem,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 8–16, Aug. 2024.

[5] Telecom Infra Project, “OpenRAN Project Group Progress Report 2023,” TIP Technical Paper, Dec. 2023.

[6] 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; NG-RAN; Architecture description (Release 18),” 3GPP TS 38.401 V18.2.0, Dec. 2023.

[7] O-RAN Alliance, “Conformance Test Specification – Fronthaul (O-RAN.WG4.CUS-TS),” v09.0, Feb. 2024.

[8] L. Khan, J. R. Lin, and Y. Zhang, “AI/ML-Enhanced Near-Real-Time RAN Control for O-RAN,” IEEE Network, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 76–84, May 2024.

[9] K. Chavva, T. Wang, and S. Gupta, “A Simulation Framework for O-RAN Interoperability Testing,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 125963–125977, Oct. 2024.

[10] ETSI, “Interoperability Testing in Disaggregated RAN Systems,” ETSI Technical Report TR 103 894, Sep. 2024.

[11] A. Ksentini, L. Cominardi, and P. Bertin, “Security in Open RAN: Risks and Standardization Efforts,” IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 54–61, Sep. 2024.

[12] Thirunagalingam, A. (2024). Transforming real-time data processing: the impact of AutoML on dynamic data pipelines. Available at SSRN 5047601.

Published

2025-09-12

How to Cite

1.
Sharma V. Interoperability and Vendor Neutrality in O-RAN Deployments. IJETCSIT [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 12 [cited 2025 Oct. 11];:88-94. Available from: https://www.ijetcsit.org/index.php/ijetcsit/article/view/392

Similar Articles

11-20 of 277

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.