Risk-Adaptive Cloud-to-Edge Application and Data Update Architecture for Android-Based Embedded Systems Using Lightweight Edge AI Validation

Authors

  • Srikanth Puram Independent Researcher, Mobile and Embedded Software Architecture Novi, Michigan, USA. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9246.IJETCSIT-V5I4P125

Keywords:

Android Embedded Systems, Cloud-To-Edge Security, Secure Software Update, Edge AI, Tensorflow Lite, Application Data Security, Package Validation, Risk Scoring, Rollback Safety, LiteRT

Abstract

Android-based embedded systems increasingly receive application packages, configuration data, policy files, machine-learning models, and security metadata from cloud services. These cloud-to-edge updates improve product maintainability, but they also expand the attack surface: a device can receive a stale manifest, a mismatched split package, a corrupted artifact, an unsafe policy revision, or a model update that is technically valid but operationally risky for the current device state. This paper proposes a risk-adaptive cloud-to-edge application and data update architecture for Android-based embedded systems using lightweight edge AI validation. The architecture combines signed update manifests, artifact-level integrity checks, application data-security controls, persisted update-state management, package compatibility verification, rollback-safe orchestration, and a quantized on-device risk classifier. The edge AI component does not replace deterministic security gates; instead, it prioritizes, defers, quarantines, or escalates updates based on contextual risk features such as signature status, manifest freshness, package version drift, retry history, rollback frequency, network trust, power state, storage pressure, and prior installation failures. The proposed architecture is designed for industry environments where Android applications run on embedded, automotive-style, kiosk, retail, industrial, or managed-device platforms and where cloud-delivered updates must be secure, observable, recoverable, and operationally safe. A reproducible evaluation framework is provided using metrics for false acceptance, false rejection, validation latency, memory overhead, rollback detection time, manifest replay resistance, and update completion reliability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] M. Souppaya, K. Scarfone, and D. Dodson, “Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF) Version 1.1,” NIST Special Publication 800-218, Feb. 2022.

[2] National Institute of Standards and Technology, “The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0,” NIST CSWP 29, Feb. 2024.

[3] National Institute of Standards and Technology, “Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0),” NIST AI 100-1, Jan. 2023.

[4] S. Rose, O. Borchert, S. Mitchell, and S. Connelly, “Zero Trust Architecture,” NIST Special Publication 800-207, Aug. 2020.

[5] OWASP Foundation, “Mobile Application Security Verification Standard,” 2024.

[6] J. Samuel et al., “The Update Framework: A Framework for Securing Software Update Systems,” USENIX Security, 2010.

[7] T. K. Kuppusamy, L. A. DeLong, and J. Cappos, “Uptane: Securing Software Updates for Automobiles,” ESCAR USA, 2016.

[8] T. K. Kuppusamy, L. A. DeLong, and J. Cappos, “Securing Software Updates for Automotives Using Uptane,” USENIX ;login:, vol. 42, no. 2, 2017.

[9] Google, “TensorFlow Lite is now LiteRT,” Google Developers Blog, Sep. 2024.

[10] Google, “LiteRT: High-Performance On-Device Machine Learning,” Google AI Edge Documentation, 2024.

[11] R. David et al., “TensorFlow Lite Micro: Embedded Machine Learning on TinyML Systems,” arXiv:2010.08678, 2020.

[12] C. Banbury et al., “MLPerf Tiny Benchmark,” arXiv:2106.07597, 2021.

[13] Android Developers, “PackageInstaller,” Android Developer Documentation, 2024.

[14] Android Open Source Project, “A/B System Updates,” AOSP Documentation, 2024.

[15] Android Open Source Project, “Dynamic Partitions,” AOSP Documentation, 2024.

[16] E. Rescorla, “The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3,” RFC 8446, Aug. 2018.

[17] ISO, “ISO 26262: Road Vehicles - Functional Safety,” International Organization for Standardization, 2018.

[18] P. Koopman, Better Embedded System Software. Drumnadrochit Education, 2010.

Published

2024-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Puram S. Risk-Adaptive Cloud-to-Edge Application and Data Update Architecture for Android-Based Embedded Systems Using Lightweight Edge AI Validation. IJETCSIT [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 30 [cited 2026 Jul. 4];5(4):221-6. Available from: https://www.ijetcsit.org/index.php/ijetcsit/article/view/766

Similar Articles

21-30 of 638

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.